Can’t find the part? Let’s recreate it.

Having the original typically provides the most reliable reference. For simpler parts, detailed photos and measurements may be enough to start an evaluation. Complex mating geometry often requires a physical sample or dimensional data.

Potentially. We can infer missing features when the remaining geometry, matching components, symmetry or other references provide enough information. The resulting design may require a test print and fit adjustments.

Both may be used. We select the method based on the part’s size, surface, complexity and accuracy needs. Scan data often requires cleanup and measurement-based verification before it becomes useful CAD geometry.

We aim to match the relevant geometry and function, but an exact copy cannot be guaranteed. Printing technology, material properties, measurement uncertainty and wear on the reference all affect the result. We discuss critical tolerances before accepting a job.

Many discontinued plastic parts are good candidates, especially when a physical reference is available. We assess fit, loading, temperature, exposure and other application requirements to determine whether 3D printing is appropriate.

We can evaluate potential changes such as reinforcing features, adjusting thickness or choosing a different material. Improvements are engineering proposals subject to testing; they are not automatically guaranteed to perform better.

Suitability must be assessed case by case. We do not automatically certify reverse-engineered or FDM printed parts for safety-critical, regulated or high-load applications. For those uses, additional engineering analysis, material testing or another manufacturing method may be necessary.

Complexity, part condition, access to reference dimensions, CAD reconstruction effort and prototype iterations are the main factors. Send photos and details for a review and project-specific estimate.